Occupational therapy
Everyday function, home setup, accessibility, adoption, and the fit between a person, task, and environment.
Qualified review
Expertise should be specific, verified, and visible.
A professional badge means little unless readers know who reviewed the work, what they reviewed, and where their expertise ends.
The review standard
What an expert review should tell you.
- 01
Verify the person
Confirm identity, current credential or documented professional background, issuing body, status, and relevant jurisdiction.
- 02
Define the scope
Assign only the claims and questions supported by that background. One credential does not authorize review of every topic.
- 03
Protect independence
Record compensation, employers, commercial relationships, samples, and other conflicts before the review starts.
- 04
Publish the record
Name the reviewer, relevant qualification, exact scope, completion date, corrections made, unresolved limits, and conflicts.
Areas of expertise
The right specialist for the exact question.
The appropriate expertise depends on whether a question concerns health, safety, privacy, accessibility or technical reliability.
Gerontology and clinical care
Health context involving falls, cognition, capacity, independent living, and appropriate limits on consumer guidance.
Pharmacy
Medication routines, dispenser workflows, missed-dose boundaries, storage, and escalation to the care team.
Audiology and hearing access
Hearing needs, call clarity, alerts, device compatibility, and communication access.
Privacy and law
Consent, recording, surveillance, data rights, contracts, and country-specific legal boundaries.
Cybersecurity
Account protection, scams, remote access, device security, recovery, and family permissions.
Emergency response
Alert chains, dispatch limitations, home access, escalation, preparedness, and responder handoff.
Connectivity and power
Cellular, Wi-Fi, backup power, failover, dependencies, coverage, and outage behavior.
Payment and independence
Pay for time, never for agreement.
Reviewers may be paid a fixed fee for defined work. Payment is not tied to a favorable conclusion, product recommendation, affiliate commission, traffic, conversion, or the absence of corrections.
- Commercial teams cannot select the reviewer or narrow the review scope.
- Manufacturers cannot approve the verdict or reviewer language.
- Material conflicts appear with the review credit.
- A reviewer may require correction, add a limitation, decline the credit, or recommend that a page not publish.
- Professional review provides general context and does not create an individual care relationship with the reader.
Public review record
What readers will see.
- Reviewer
- Real public name and profile
- Qualification
- Relevant verified credential or professional background
- Scope
- Exact sections and claim types reviewed
- Completed
- Date of the review on the current version
- Conflicts
- Payment and relevant relationships
- Limitations
- Questions outside the review or still unresolved
Explore our standards